Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1980No. Civ. A. 77-2221PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Sixteen named plaintiffs bring this action under § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation by their union, defendant Warehouse Employee Union Local 169 (“Local 169”), and a breach of a collective bargaining agreement by defendant Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (“A & P”). The salient facts of this case are set out at D.C., 461 F.Supp. 425.
Plaintiffs’ case was heard in April, 1980. Subsequently, the defendants moved for dismissal contending, inter alia, that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Line Drivers Local No. 961 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. W. J. Digby, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Pittsburgh Die Sinkers Lodge No. 50 v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ruppert v. Cumberland Brewing Co. of Allegany County, Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harbor Insurance v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Philip Morris Inc. v. Pittsburgh Penguins, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982