Legal Opinion
Philip Morris Inc. v. Pittsburgh Penguins, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-1919PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
I. Procedural Background
This case comes before us on a complaint seeking, inter alia, a preliminary injunction, restraining and enjoining the Pittsburgh Penguins, Inc. (“Penguins”) and the Civic Arena Corporation (“CAC”) from interfering with a contract for advertising at the Civic Arena (“Arena”) entered into by the plaintiff, Philip Morris Incorporated (“Philip Morris”), and the Penguins, and from interfering with advertising sold or rented to the plaintiff under the aforementioned contract.
An amended complaint was filed by the plaintiff in which American Sign…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Ammond, Alene S., in Her Capacity as a Member of the Senate of New Jersey and Individually v. Joseph L. McGahnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. Acchioni & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kleintop v. KleintopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. E-Z Parks, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Chestnut Ridge Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Fox Grocery Co. (In Re Chestnut Ridge Plaza Associates, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- JC PENNEY COMPANY v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
- White v. United States Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.