Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Sixteen named plaintiffs bring this action under § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement by defendant Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company and breach of the duty of fair representation by their union, Warehouse Employee Union Local No. 169. A & P has moved for summary judgment on all counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons set forth below, A & P’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The suit arose out of A & P’s application of the terms of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Deboles v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- O'NEILL v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boresen v. Rohm & Haas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dian v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jenkins v. United Steel Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Jones Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.