Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-2221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

Sixteen named plaintiffs bring this action under § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement by defendant Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company and breach of the duty of fair representation by their union, Warehouse Employee Union Local No. 169. A & P has moved for summary judgment on all counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons set forth below, A & P’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

The suit arose out of A & P’s application of the terms of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Deboles v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. O'NEILL v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boresen v. Rohm & Haas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Dian v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Jenkins v. United Steel Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Arnold v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Jones Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API