Legal Opinion

Wright v. Griffith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1890No. 13,890PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

— Action upon a writing in the following words:

“Union City, Ind., March 17th, 1882.
“Messrs. Griffith Brothers:
“ Please let. my daughter, Mrs. W. E. Headington, have what goods she wants and I will stand good for the money to settle the bills. You will find the pay part all right with her I think. Yours truly, Vm. Wright.”

The questions presented arise on the complaint, the material averments of which are to the effect that Mrs. Heading-ton applied to the plaintiffs to purchase millinery goods, and that the plaintiffs declined to furnish them to her on credit; that thereupon, in consideration…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Union Bank v. . Coster's ExecutorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Goeke v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
  3. Closson v. BillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Conduitt v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. First Trust Co. v. Airedale Ranch & Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API