Legal Opinion

Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 22, 1988No. 01-88-00046-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

James and Bette Cathey appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Metrópoli- tan Life Insurance Co. (Met), Dow Chemical Co. (Dow), and Michael H. Maddolin. The appellants alleged multiple common law and statutory causes of action for: (1) breach of contract under Tex.Ins.Code Ann. art. 3.62 (Vernon 1981); (2) unfair insurance practices in violation of Tex.Ins. Code Ann. art. 21.21, sec. 16 (Vernon 1981); (3) deceptive trade practices, unfair insurance practices, and unconscionable conduct in violation of Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. secs. 17.46(b), and 17.50(a)(lHa)(4)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Castillo v. Neely's TBA Dealer Supply, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Cadillac Insurance Co. v. L.P.C. Distributing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Burghart v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API