Burghart v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLEIL, Justice.
Edna Burghart appeals from the trial court’s granting of a summary judgment in favor of Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. The primary question on appeal is whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Burghart’s state law claims against the insurance company were preempted by federal law. We determine that summary judgment was improper because a fact issue exists as to whether the insurance plan is a plan pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp.1990); furthermore, summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Credit Managers Ass'n v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacKey v. Great Lakes Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- McLellan v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- National Council of Allied Employees v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
- Steve Wimberly, Individually and D/B/A Erection Company, and 300 Baylor, Inc. v. Fritz, Byrne & Head, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001