Legal Opinion

Burghart v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1991No. 6-90-072-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLEIL, Justice.

Edna Burghart appeals from the trial court’s granting of a summary judgment in favor of Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. The primary question on appeal is whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Burghart’s state law claims against the insurance company were preempted by federal law. We determine that summary judgment was improper because a fact issue exists as to whether the insurance plan is a plan pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp.1990); furthermore, summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Credit Managers Ass'n v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacKey v. Great Lakes Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  2. McLellan v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. National Council of Allied Employees v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  4. Steve Wimberly, Individually and D/B/A Erection Company, and 300 Baylor, Inc. v. Fritz, Byrne & Head, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API