Legal Opinion
Bass Public Ltd. Co. v. Promus Companies Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 30, 1994No. 92 Civ. 0969 (SWK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this action arising under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, defendant The Promus Companies Incorporated (“Promus”) appeals from an April 25, 1994 Memorandum and Order issued by Magistrate Judge Naomi Buchwald compelling the law firm of Latham & Watkins (“Latham”) to produce certain documents to plaintiffs. Latham argues that the documents are not discoverable as they contain privileged attorney work product and attorney-client…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Citicorp v. Interbank Card Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- In Re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- In Re Mirant Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.