Legal Opinion

Ruff v. Weintraub

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 1987PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

We granted certification, 104 N.J. 416 (1986), to decide whether a jury in a personal injury action should be instructed that the proper measure of damages for lost future wages is net income after taxes. Since evidence of lost income is often introduced in the form of gross rather than net wages, we must also determine whether evidence of the plaintiff’s future tax liability is admissible. In addition, this case presents the issue, decided today in Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp., 105 N.J. 223 (1986), whether a trial court must instruct the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. John R. McWeeney v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Thabault v. Chait Ex Rel. Estate of ChaitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API