Pruiss v. City of Springfield
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The judge correctly ruled that G. L. c. 85, § 14B, as amended through St. 1974, c. 529, § 1, applies to vehicles owned and used by a city for governmental purposes. That section requires “commercial vehicles having a gross weight in excess of five thousand pounds other than a motor bus or taxicab, or any automobile service truck” to carry not fewer than three flares and to use them if the vehicle becomes disabled upon the traveled portion of a highway during a time when motor vehicles are required to display lights. The word “commercial” is not used in contradistinction to
Alfredo A. Vivenzio,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dubus v. Dresser IndustriesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Duncan v. Wiseman Baking CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Cronenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fortunato v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- 1010 Memorial Drive Tenants Corp. v. Fire Chief of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997