Legal Opinion

Pruiss v. City of Springfield

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 7, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judge correctly ruled that G. L. c. 85, § 14B, as amended through St. 1974, c. 529, § 1, applies to vehicles owned and used by a city for governmental purposes. That section requires “commercial vehicles having a gross weight in excess of five thousand pounds other than a motor bus or taxicab, or any automobile service truck” to carry not fewer than three flares and to use them if the vehicle becomes disabled upon the traveled portion of a highway during a time when motor vehicles are required to display lights. The word “commercial” is not used in contradistinction to

Alfredo A. Vivenzio,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dubus v. Dresser IndustriesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Duncan v. Wiseman Baking CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  5. Cronenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fortunato v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  2. 1010 Memorial Drive Tenants Corp. v. Fire Chief of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API