Legal Opinion · Dissent

1010 Memorial Drive Tenants Corp. v. Fire Chief of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 27, 1997Published

1DissentGreaney, J.

(dissenting, with whom O’Connor, J., joins). The court’s decision to reverse the judgment is based on an issue of statutory interpretation that was never raised by the plaintiff (and, hence, not responded to by the defendants) in the administrative proceeding or at trial, and that is not *666discussed by either party in the briefs submitted to us. It is unusual for us to allow an issue to be raised for the first time on appeal. See Mass. R. A. P. 16 (a) (4), as amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975); Milton v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 365 Mass. 368, 379 (1974). It is still more uncommon for us to decide a case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Beeler v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Bronstein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API