Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Dryer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Umatilla: Gilbert W. Phelps, Judge. This is a suit in equity by H. T. Duncan, C. G. Brownell and J. A. Stanfield against H. N. Dryer, Mayor of the City of Umatilla, J. H. Cherry, H. E. Hatter, F. W. Cline, H. Oftedal, A. G. Means and R.1. Yerxa, as councilmen of the City of Umatilla, a municipal corporation, and H. B. Hull, recorder of the City of Umatilla, for an injunction restraining said officers from executing or delivering certain municipal bonds.

Read the full summary

From Umatilla: Gilbert W. Phelps, Judge. This is a suit in equity by H. T. Duncan, C. G. Brownell and J. A. Stanfield against H. N. Dryer, Mayor of the City of Umatilla, J. H. Cherry, H. E. Hatter, F. W. Cline, H. Oftedal, A. G. Means and R.1. Yerxa, as councilmen of the City of Umatilla, a municipal corporation, and H. B. Hull, recorder of the City of Umatilla, for an injunction restraining said officers from executing or delivering certain municipal bonds. From a decree dismissing the suit, after overruling a demurrer to the answer, plaintiffs appeal. The facts are set forth in the opinion…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eamsey

This is a suit to enjoin the defendants, as officers of the City of Umatilla, from receiving or accepting expected proposals for the purchase of the bonds referred to in the complaint, and from executing or delivering any of said bonds, etc. The plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of the City of Umatilla, and they brought this suit for themselves as taxpayers, and in behalf of all other taxpayers similarly situated, who desire to join therein and contribute to the expense thereof. The City of Umatilla was incorporated under the general laws of this state, relating to the incorporation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. Commercial Bank of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. ACME Dairy Co. v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Commonwealth v. Herald Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Haines v. City of Forest GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API