Hayden v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of possession of more than 400 grams of phenylacetone, a controlled substance. The court assessed punishment at thirty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $5000. We affirm.
The first point of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Appellant relies upon Humason v. State, 728 S.W.2d 363 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) wherein the court of criminal appeals reiterated the definition of possession and analyzed the case under circumstantial evidence criteria. In Huma-son, the court found the state had not excluded…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Coulter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Kent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991