Legal Opinion

Said v. Rouge Steel Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1995No. Docket 149367Published

1Opinion of the Court

209 Mich. App. 150 (1995)

530 N.W.2d 765

SAID

v.

ROUGE STEEL COMPANY

Docket No. 149367.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Submitted March 9, 1994, at Detroit.

Decided March 6, 1995, at 9:20 A.M.

O'Bryan Law Center, P.C. (by Harold A. Perakis), for the plaintiff.

Foster, Meadows & Ballard, P.C. (by John L. Foster and Paul A. Kettunen), for the defendant.

Before: WHITE, P.J., and MICHAEL J. KELLY and W.J. CAPRATHE,[*] JJ.

WHITE, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the dismissal of his claim against defendant for maintenance and cure. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On November 4, 1986, plaintiff was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. McKinney v. Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API