Legal Opinion

Watts v. Krebs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1998No. 23496PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This action involves a claim of fraud and waste by Harold Krebs (Krebs) to property held jointly by Krebs and Patricia Watts (Watts) as tenants in common. The district court held that Krebs was guilty of fraud and waste and awarded Watts treble damages and attorney fees. Krebs appeals.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Watts and Krebs were married. They divorced February 14, 1985. The divorce decree provided that they would hold two parcels of real property as tenants in common. The parcels had been community property. The decree ordered that the property be sold and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Walston v. Monumental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. April Beguesse, Inc. v. Kenneth RammellIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Budget Truck Sales, LLC v. TilleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Thomas O'Shea v. High Mark Development, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API