Legal Opinion

Johnson v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 31, 1988No. 2 CA-SA 88-0121PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this special action is whether the mandatory notice of a claim required by A.R.S. § 12-821(A) must be presented to an individual public employee as a prerequisite to the maintenance of an action against that employee for injuries resulting from an act or omission allegedly committed in the scope of his employment. The issue presents a question of law which has resulted in inconsistent determinations in the superior court. The statutes involved in this case were recently enacted by the legislature, and the issue presented has not been addressed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lutz v. SemcerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Crum v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Salerno v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API