Legal Opinion
Lutz v. Semcer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 8, 1974PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
126 N.J. Super. 288 (1974)
314 A.2d 86
JOSEPH F. LUTZ AND DOROTHY LUTZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EDWARD SEMCER AND PAUL BOERGERSHAUSEN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 8, 1974.
Messrs. Greenstone & Greenstone, attorney for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Braff, Litvak, Ertag, Wortmann & Harris, attorneys for defendants and Township of Millburn.
MICHELS, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs move before this court for leave to file a notice of late claim against the Township of Millburn pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, and to perfect their claim against defendant police officers.
Joseph F.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Tortorello v. ReinfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Florio v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & CieslaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.