Garbett v. Garbett
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The appellant filed his libel in divorce, alleging desertion and indignities to the person. The case was not referred to a master nor was a request ¿nade for a jury trial. The learned court before whom the case was heard concluded that neither charge was proven, and refused the divorce.
It is incumbent upon a libellant to establish his case by clear and satisfactory evidence. Unless there is this preponderance in his favor, it will be dismissed: Waggner v. Waggner, 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 382, 171 A. 102. A decree may be granted on the unsupported testimony of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Noden v. NodenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Romano v. RomanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Waggner v. WaggnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cobaugh v. CobaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Rausch v. RauschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Snyder v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940