Legal Opinion

Garbett v. Garbett

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1939No. Appeal, 228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The appellant filed his libel in divorce, alleging desertion and indignities to the person. The case was not referred to a master nor was a request ¿nade for a jury trial. The learned court before whom the case was heard concluded that neither charge was proven, and refused the divorce.

It is incumbent upon a libellant to establish his case by clear and satisfactory evidence. Unless there is this preponderance in his favor, it will be dismissed: Waggner v. Waggner, 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 382, 171 A. 102. A decree may be granted on the unsupported testimony of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noden v. NodenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Romano v. RomanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Waggner v. WaggnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobaugh v. CobaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Rausch v. RauschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Snyder v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API