Legal Opinion

Romano v. Romano

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1937No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

On May 27, 1936 libellant filed his libel in divorce alleging cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to the person. Hearings were held before a judge of the court of common pleas, who granted a divorce on the ground of indignities. He concluded his opinion as follows: “From the appearance of the parties we are persuaded respondent was guilty of tlie charges made against her and that libellant is entitled to the decree of divorce......”

On an appeal in a divorce proceeding (when there is no jury trial) we have repeatedly held it is the duty of this court to make a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Wagner v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Esenwein v. EsenweinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Conrad v. ConradSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Cobaugh v. CobaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Garbett v. GarbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Oyler v. Oyler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API