Legal Opinion

Rausch v. Rausch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1941No. Appeal, 216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The lower court granted a divorce on the ground of cruel and barbarous treatment. We are unable to find evidence sustaining a decree on that ground nor on desertion or indignities which are also charged in the libel. In our view there is no evidence of a single act of cruel and barbarous treatment. As to desertion, libellant was not driven from his home, as he asserts, and the conduct of the wife did not supply reasonable cause for his leaving. On the charge of indignities, the testimony, considered in its entirety, does not meet the standard of clear and satisfactory proof…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Platt v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Laclair v. LaclairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. McCommons, Jr. v. McCommonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Scott v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simons v. SimonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. McGuigan v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Harding v. HardingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Schwarzkopf v. SchwarzkopfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Schwertz v. SchwertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API