Legal Opinion
United States v. Audelio Arzola-Amaya, Santiago Rosas-Arzola, Edward v. Maynard, Edison Alvarez, Jorge Humberto Salazar and Jesus Estrada-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1989No. 88-1108PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge:
On September 16, 1988, the grand jury for the El Paso Division of the Western District of Texas returned a superseding indictment charging Audelio Arzola-Ama-ya (“Arzola-Amaya”) as a principal administrator, organizer, and the leader of a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(b). In addition, all six Appellants, Arzola-Amaya, Santiago Rosas-Arzola (“Rosas-Arzola”), Edward V. Maynard, Edison Alvarez, Jorge Humberto Salazar, and Jesus Estrada-Hernandez (“Estrada-Hernandez”) were charged with conspiracy to possess a quantity of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.