Legal Opinion

Feldhaus v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 20, 2010No. SC 90585PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

Introduction

Damon Feldhaus challenges the validity of § 577.023, RSMo Supp.2008. 1 Feldhaus asserts that the statute violates the void for vagueness doctrine, and, therefore, he was denied due process of law. This Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over cases involving the validity of a statute. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3.

Facts

Damon Feldhaus was stopped June 10, 2007, for driving while intoxicated. Fel-dhaus was stopped again November 27, 2007, for driving under the influence of marijuana. The State charged Feldhaus with one count of the class B felony of driving…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. NeherSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Garris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API