Legal Opinion

State v. Nunley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 31, 2011No. SC 76981PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Chief Justice.

I. Introduction

Nunley pled guilty to first degree murder, armed criminal action, forcible rape, and kidnapping. He waived jury sentencing. He did so for strategic reasons because he was afraid that if he went before a jury, it might sentence him to death. The defendant’s original guilty plea and jury sentencing waiver remained valid after his case was remanded for re-sentencing. Because of Nunley’s guilty plea and waiver, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and State v. Whitfield, 107 S.W.3d 253, 265 *614(Mo. banc 2003), do…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Bromwell v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Windeknecht v. MesmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. State v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State of Missouri v. Kyle W. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API