Miller v. McAlister
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
The threshold and dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a trial judge is obligated to render findings of fact and conclusions of law when properly requested to do so by a party pursuant to Rule 52(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude that the trial judge, when requested to do so, must set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on that basis, we reverse the judgment below and remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law, along with a corresponding judgment.
I. BACKGROUND.
The appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Whittemore v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Phoenix v. Consolidated Water CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Lewis v. FarrahArizona Supreme Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Marriage of Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Miller v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Cross v. Elected Officials Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.