Legal Opinion
Miller v. Board of Supervisors
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1993No. CV-92-0269-APPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
Dr. Jack Harmon (“Harmon”) brings a direct appeal from an injunction granted by the Superior Court of Pinal County in an action challenging nominating petitions. See A.R.S. § 16-351 (1984) (establishing the proper procedure to challenge such petitions). The trial court ruled that Harmon’s petitions lacked sufficient valid signatures to qualify him for the ballot in the Democratic primary election for the office of Pinal County Superintendent of Schools.
This court has direct jurisdiction to review election appeals from the superior court. A.R.S. § 16-351(A) (“Such…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. MerzSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- McDowell Mountain Ranch Land Coalition v. VizcainoArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Douglas Auto & Equipment v. State Comp fund/zazuetaArizona Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.