Legal Opinion

In Re Peel Gallery of Fine Arts

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 19, 1988No. 86-545PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahady, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Travel Information Council (Council), which denied appellant’s renewal of licenses for two official business directional signs. The signs are part of the system of signs “erected and maintained by the [S]tate to indicate to the travelling public the route and the distance to public accommodations, commercial services for the travelling public, and points of scenic, historic, cultural, educational and religious interest.” 10 V.S.A. § 481(2). We hold that Rule 14 of the Council as applied to this appellant violates the statutory authority of the Council.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Bishop v. Town of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Montgomery v. Brinver Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Slocum v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In Re Appeals of ANR Permits in Lowell Mountain Wind ProjectSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Delozier v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. In Re Capital Investment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Peabody v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API