Legal Opinion

Allen v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2005No. 04-871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, LLC (CFAC) appeals from an order of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, denying its motion for change of venue. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying CFAC’s motion to change venue.

*234PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Respondent Robert W. Allen and forty-six other plaintiffs (hereafter collectively “Allen”) seek damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium stemming from the contraction of asbestos related disease by them or their spouses. Allen filed this original complaint on July 6, 2001, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Joyce v. GarnaasMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WetzelMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Johnson v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Williams v. Wellman-Power Gas, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Circle S Seeds of Montana, Inc. v. Montana Merchandising, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. AndronescuMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. FARMERS UNION ASS'N v. PaquinMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Keeney v. Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Billmayer v. City of KalispellMontana Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API