State v. Wetzel
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Scott L. Wetzel (Wetzel) was charged with, and ultimately pled guilty to, felony criminal possession of dangerous drugs. He appeals the Fifth Judicial District Court’s denial of his Motion to Suppress. We affirm.
ISSUE
¶2 Did the District Court err in denying Wetzel’s Motion to Suppress?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶3 At approximately 10:30 p.m. on March 12, 2003, officers responded to an attempted shoplifting call from the Montana City Store. The suspects, later identified as Maria and Scott Wetzel, had left the store by the time the officers arrived, but had driven across the street…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. BieberMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ShultsMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Czajkowski v. MeyersMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. D. HurlbertMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MunsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.