Legal Opinion

State Tax Commission v. Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1941No. Civil No. 4303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This action was filed by C. M. Martin against D. C. O’Neil, Thad M. Moore and C. Warren Peterson, as members of the tax commission of Arizona, to recover $18,392.60 paid by him under protest in accordance with the provisions of the Excise Revenue Act, Code, 1939, § 73-1301 et seq. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount sought with interest was rendered and the tax commission appeals.

The facts out of which the action grows are substantially as hereinafter stated. Prom May 1, 1935, until the date of the trial appellee, C. M. Martin, was engaged in the wholesale hardware, farm supply,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Commercial Securities Corp. Consolidated v. Babbitt Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Crane Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Arizona Tax Commission v. Dairy & Consumers Cooperative Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. O'Neil v. United Producers & Consumers CooperativeArizona Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API