Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. United Producers & Consumers Cooperative

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1941No. Civil No. 4339PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

A question having arisen as to whether the United Producers and Consumers Cooperative, a corporation, was liable for the payment of the sales tax of 2% on sales made by it from and after January 31, 1938, that corporation brought an action against D. C. O’Neil, Thad M. Moore and C. Warren Peterson, members of the state tax commission of Arizona, under the declaratory judgments act, sections 27-701 to 27-706, Arizona Code of 1939, to have its rights and those of the tax commission relative to the payment of this tax ascertained and declared by a judgment of the court.

The agreed statement of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giragi v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Independent School District, Class A, No. 1 v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Smith v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Shanks, Auditor v. Ky. Independent Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Arizona Tax Commission v. Dairy & Consumers Cooperative Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus GrowersArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Miami Copper Co. Division, Tennessee Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API