Major v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1975.]
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
The General Assembly, mindful of the safety of persons in this State and heedful of the general welfare, has acted to deter a person who has consumed alcohol from driving a vehicle on the highways of Maryland. There are criminal consequences and administrative consequences. In the two September Term, 1975 appeals which we decide in this opinion, John H. Major, Jr. v. State, No. 998, and James William Flanagan v. State, No. 1030, we are concerned with the criminal consequences of drunken driving. The appeals pose, in different factual postures, a common question: may a person be convicted of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Height v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Nooe v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nast v. LockettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. WerkheiserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.