Legal Opinion

Farnan v. First Union National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1964No. 239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRe, J.

This appeal presents for discussion and decision two questions or propositions.(1) Plaintiffs make the following contentions: The provisions of the will are vague and uncertain in that it contains no guide, formula or instructions by which testator’s wishes with respect to the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of North Carolina (hereinafter “church”) might be carried out or the time within which the specified conditions imposed must be met and complied with. The gift to the church is contingent and not vested. The contingency arises by reason of certain conditions precedent which must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Fitchie v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Stellings v. AutrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Kolb v. LandesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BartschiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Banner v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Brown Bros. Harriman Trust Co. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. BROWN BROS. HARRIMAN TRUST CO. v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API