Legal Opinion

Levine v. Bradley Real Estate Trust

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1990No. C5-89-2029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Judge.

Appellants commenced this action to, among other claims, enjoin respondent from violating an unrecorded reciprocal parking easement. Appellants argue that respondent had either actual or implied notice of the unrecorded easement, thereby precluding its good faith purchaser status. After a four-day trial, the trial court concluded that respondent had neither actual nor implied notice and therefore was entitled to protection of the recording statute. Minn.Stat. § 507.34 (1988). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants Robert Levine, Marion Levine, Nancy Levine ■ Saliterman, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Levine v. Twin City Red Barn No. 2, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Comstock & Davis, Inc. v. G.D.S. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API