Legal Opinion

Jacob v. Chaplin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1993No. 46A04-9210-CV-377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This certified interlocutory appeal is a case of first impression in Indiana. The broad issue presented is whether a party has a presumptive right to establish conditions for a court ordered routine, Ind.Trial Rule 35 physical examination.1 The specific issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion (and in the process, decided a new question of law) by issuing a protective order which in effect said that a plaintiff in a personal injury action, ordered to undergo a routine T.R. 85 examination, is entitled as a matter of right to tape record all conversations with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kirk Huffman v. Gene HainsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. ReevesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Jacob v. ChaplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Galieti v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. BELL v. LITTLEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API