Jacob v. Chaplin
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This certified interlocutory appeal is a case of first impression in Indiana. The broad issue presented is whether a party has a presumptive right to establish conditions for a court ordered routine, Ind.Trial Rule 35 physical examination.1 The specific issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion (and in the process, decided a new question of law) by issuing a protective order which in effect said that a plaintiff in a personal injury action, ordered to undergo a routine T.R. 85 examination, is entitled as a matter of right to tape record all conversations with the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirk Huffman v. Gene HainsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Chrysler Corp. v. ReevesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Jacob v. ChaplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Galieti v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- BELL v. LITTLEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024