Legal Opinion
Luiz E Lima De Moraes v. Greyhound Lines, et al.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 26, 2026No. 2:23-cv-06764Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIZ E LIMA DE MORAES, Case No. 2:23-cv-06764-FLA (ASx) 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF DECISION 13 v. FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL 14 GREYHOUND LINES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 RULING 2 Plaintiff Luiz E. Lima De Moraes (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this 3 action against Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.1 (“Defendant” or “Greyhound”) for 4 lost goods pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 14706, et seq. (the “Carmack Amendment”). FAC 5 at 2–3.2 6 The court held a bench trial on May 6,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Eva Hall v. North American Van Lines, Inc. George Correa All City Moving and StorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.