Legal Opinion
Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 22, 1990No. 89-3057PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
This case involves an appeal by a common carrier, Bowman Transportation, Inc. (“Bowman”), from the district court’s order finding it liable to Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. (“Fine Foliage”), for the value of ferns damaged due to an incorrect temperature setting on a refrigerated container unit. Bowman contends that the lower court erred in finding that Fine Foliage established a prima facie case under the Car-mack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707, and that it erred in finding that a protective service tariff that Bowman had on file with the Interstate Commerce Commission…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Goforth v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Reider v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Capitol Converting Equipment, Incorporated v. Lep Transport, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,036 Accura Systems, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Beta Spawn, Inc. v. Ffe Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- A.I.G. Uruguay Compania De Seguros, S.A. v. AAA Cooper TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Chubb Group of Insurance v. H.A. Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.