Legal Opinion

Zwerdling v. Hamman Building Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

This is a motion to set aside a subpoena issued by the attorney for the judgment creditors under the authority of section 773-a of the Civil Practice Act.

The first objection is directed to the form of the subpoena. It is urged that the stock phrase “ office and post office address ” is omitted. The statute provides: “ It must be subscribed in the name of the attorney for the judgment creditor and with his office address, specifying a place within the state where there is a post office.”

The subpoena was subscribed as follows:

“ Victor Whitehorn,
“ Attorney for judgment creditors,
“ 26 Court…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. Elite Model Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Haas v. ReiserNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. L. B. Syndicate Corp. v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API