Legal Opinion

L. B. Syndicate Corp. v. Lee

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

At the time of the argument, the judgment debtor represented that he was ill and could not attend on the day to which his examination in supplementary proceedings had been adjourned; also at the argument, in reply to the judgment creditor’s accusation that the judgment debtor testified falsely on the examination about his ownership of an automobile, the judgment debtor’s attorney said that he would file an affidavit explaining that testimony.

Supplementary proceedings are a source of expense and annoyance to judgment creditors and their attorneys. They usually follow the recovery of judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zwerdling v. Hamman Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API