Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. George N. Sparling Coal Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1914No. 3956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Greeley W. Whit-ford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

*262For convenience, the plaintiff in error will be called: the Fuel Company, and the defendant in error the Sparling Company.

The controversy here under consideration concerns only the counter-claim made by the Fuel Company against the Sparling Company, which was resolved in favor of the latter upon trial before the court without a jury. There is no dispute as to the facts, which, so far as necessary to state', are substantially as follows: Both companies were dealers in coal, handling the same in carload lots, and both having offices in the city of Denver. George E. Sparling was president and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Dows v. . PerrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. Squires v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadow Homes Development Corp. v. BowensColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Premier Bank v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Ladd & Tilton Bank v. SmallWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kowalchik v. BrohlColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API