Legal Opinion

Meadow Homes Development Corp. v. Bowens

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2009No. 08CA1476PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CONNELLY.

This case involves competing claims to a bond: a "security" covered by Revised Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). See §§ 4-8-101 to -511, C.R.S8.2008 (codifying Revised Article 8 in substantial part and in all parts relevant to this case). The parties who had or elaimed interests in the bond were: (A) the original owners of the bond (collectively the Horvats); (B) appellee Meadow Homes Development Corp., the entity that was entitled to purchase the bond if the Horvats failed to close on the underlying property development; and (C) appellant Ronald R.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. YOUNG v. KayeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. In re the Marriage of GrubbSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gattis v. McNuttColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Holley v. HuangColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Peña v. American FamilyColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Chase Investment Services Corp. v. Law Offices of Jon Divens & Associates, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Clark v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API