Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 13, 1955No. 52 C 2121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

This is an action by The Central National Bank in Chicago against the Reconstruction Finance Corporation for breach of contract. Federal jurisdiction rests upon the ownership by the United States of the entire capital stock of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, the requisite jurisdictional amount being involved. The statute creating the RFC and amendatory legislation provided that all of its stock be held by the United States Government, 15 U.S.C. § 601, 15 U.S.C.A. § 601. Any suit by or against the RFC is therefore a suit arising under the laws of the United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Matter of DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Fields v. Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
  5. Machine Tool & Equipment Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
  2. Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  3. American Trust Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API