Fields v. Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
It was admitted on the argument that both of the defendants (and both joined in the petition to remove) were incorporated under an Act of Congress and are federal corporations.
Until February 13, 1925, it was the law that a suit against a federal corporation, if the jurisdictional amount was involved, was a removable suit for that it was a suit arising under the laws of the United States. Osborn v. United States Bank, 9 Wheat. 738, 6 L.Ed. 204; Union Pac. R. Co. v. Myers (Texas, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kirk), 115 U.S. 1, 2, 5 S.Ct. 1113, 29 L.Ed. 319. On February 13, 1925, what…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Conjugal Society v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McReynoldsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1969
- Central National Bank v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955