Legal Opinion

Burke v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1916PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants.

The single question presented by the record is whether the evidence on the part of the plaintiff was legally sufficient to be submitted to the jury, to show negligence upon the part of the defendants and that such negligence was the cause of the alleged injuries.

The Court below, by its instruction at the close of the plaintiff’s case, withdrew the case from the consideration of the jury, and directed a verdict for the defendants, and the action of the Court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  3. Baltimore Elevator Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Mallette Ex Rel. Thomas v. British American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Mayor of Aldermen v. StallingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Frenkil v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. Patapsco Loan Co. v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Acme Poultry Corp. v. MelvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Hill v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Lozzi v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API