In re Jones

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had suspended Jones on the basis of the report and recommendations of its disciplinary board (disciplinary board) which had found him in violation of DR 1-102 (A) (4), conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and DR 1-102 (A) (6), conduct that adversely reflects on an attorney’s fitness to practice law. A hearing committee of the disciplinary board had determined that Jones had “failed to produce any evidence which rebuts the evidence . . . establishing that Respondent misrepresented the nature, extent and worth of his…