Legal Opinion

In re Pressman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 12, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This bar discipline proceeding presents the question whether this court may discipline a lawyer based solely on testimony that the lawyer gave pursuant to an immunity order issued by a Federal judge.

In 1993, Joel M. Pressman, an attorney and former mayor of Chelsea, testified before a Federal grand jury and later in a Federal criminal trial pursuant to an order issued by a Federal District Court judge. That order provided that “[n]o testimony or other information compelled under this Order, or any information directly or indirectly derived from such *515testimony or other information, may be used…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kelley v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Locator Services Group, Ltd. v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. BonnettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. In re EisenhauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. In re KarahalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Adoption of AstridMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API