Legal Opinion
Rodehorst Bros. v. City of Norfolk Bd. of Adjustment
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2014No. S-13-253PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets RODEHORST BROS. v. CITY OF NORFOLK BD. OF ADJUSTMENT 779 Cite as
287 Neb. 779
hereby order him disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Nebraska, effective immediately. Respondent shall forthwith comply with all terms of Neb. Ct. R. § 3-316 of the disciplinary rules, and upon failure to do so, he shall be subject to punishment for contempt of this court. Accordingly, respond nt is directed to pay costs and expenses in accordance e with
Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 7-114
and 7-115 (Reissue 2012) and Neb. Ct. R. §§ 3-310(P) (rev. 2014) and 3-323 of the disci- plinary rules…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AbdullahNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GilliamNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Strode v. City of AshlandNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Hochstein v. Cedar Cty. Bd. of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- McEwen v. Nebraska State College Sys.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.