Harris v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OlaeksoN, J.,
after stating the case: the only legal question presented by the appeal is the power of the city of Durham to sell property owned by the city and used for governmental purposes and a vacant lot. Briefly summing up the facts as found by the learned judge who tried this case: It is the intention of the city of Durham to sell certain municipally owned property, consisting of the old Municipal Building, in which are located certain offices of the city government, and the adjoining lot, and with the funds derived from such sale to:(a) Secure a new building and to renovate this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen v. Town of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Turner v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- City of Asheville v. HerbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.