Legal Opinion
Lauer v. Palms
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1902PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Case by Nicholas Lauer against Francis F. Palms, Michael W. O’Brien, and Clotilde Palms Book, trustees of the estate of Francis Palms, deceased, for injuries caused by the fall of the wall of a building. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendants, who have brought the case here by writ of error. A large number of the assignments of error grow out of the charge of the judge, and his refusal to give certain requests of defendants; so that it becomes important to know what the court charged the jury. His charge was as follows:
*673“This action is brought by Nicholas Lauer against the ’ defendants for damages resulting from an injury which • happened to the plaintiff on the 12th day of December, 11899, on Woodbridge street west, by reason of the collapse of the east wall of the so-called…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hickman v. Parks Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Blickley v. Luce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Waller v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.