Legal Opinion

Austero v. National Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1976No. Civ. 15460PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Dorothy Austero (hereafter “plaintiff’), the wife of Julius S. Austero, an incompetent, instituted this action as guardian ad litem of her husband and individually on her own behalf seeking compensatory and punitive damages for defendants’ refusal to pay to Julius disability benefits allegedly due under policies of disability insurance and for defendants’ alleged breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing arising out of the insurance policies.

The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer with leave to amend to plaintiff’s first amended complaint insofar…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. United Fire Insurance v. McClellandNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  5. Quigley v. Pet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API