Legal Opinion

Estate of Hafner

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1986No. B005226PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DANIELSON, J.

The principle issue presented by this case is: as between the surviving, innocent, wife and children of a bigamous husband, and his surviving, innocent, putative spouse1 and their child, who is entitled to *1377succeed to the husband’s intestate estate when that estate is, as to his surviving wife and children, the husband’s separate property and is, as to the putative spouse, quasi-marital property?

We hold that, as separate property, one-half of the estate goes to the surviving wife and four children of the decedent for distribution pursuant to former section 221 of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McDowell & Craig v. City of Santa Fe SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of San Diego v. RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. In Re the Marriage of UmphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Parson v. ParsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. City of San Diego v. RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Davis v. City of National CityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API