Estate of Hafner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DANIELSON, J.
The principle issue presented by this case is: as between the surviving, innocent, wife and children of a bigamous husband, and his surviving, innocent, putative spouse1 and their child, who is entitled to *1377succeed to the husband’s intestate estate when that estate is, as to his surviving wife and children, the husband’s separate property and is, as to the putative spouse, quasi-marital property?
We hold that, as separate property, one-half of the estate goes to the surviving wife and four children of the decedent for distribution pursuant to former section 221 of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- McDowell & Craig v. City of Santa Fe SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of San Diego v. RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- In Re the Marriage of UmphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Parson v. ParsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- City of San Diego v. RiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Davis v. City of National CityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.