Legal Opinion

State v. Leeloo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 1999No. Nos. 41480-1-I; 41576-0-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam

— Counsel in these appeals allege they can find no good faith argument to raise on review and have moved to withdraw pursuant to State v. Theobald1 and Anders v. California2 Our preliminary review of the files indicates that counsel have neither reviewed nor provided this court with transcripts of certain hearings. We take this opportunity to clarify counsel’s duties and the record requirements under Anders.3 For the reasons set forth below, we hold that Anders requires counsel to review and provide this court with a record, of sentencing and plea hearings before a motion to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. State v. TheobaldWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API